Warren Buffett has said that gold is “just about the last thing” he would like to own – he would “much prefer” acres of land, an apartment or candy to the precious metal

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.

Warren Buffett was once asked if gold still had a place in modern investing. His answer? It’s “just about the last thing I want to own.”

The question came up during Berkshire Hathaway’s 2005 annual meeting. An attendee wanted to know if Buffett, as one of the world’s most influential investors, should recognize gold’s historic role as a financial foundation—especially in an era of inflation, asset bubbles, and increasing instability. Buffett didn’t deny the risks, but he didn’t shy away from the metal.

“I would much rather have 100 acres of land near here in Nebraska, or an apartment house, or an index fund,” he said.

For Buffett, it all comes down to utility. Gold, in his words, produces nothing. “If you had gold, you paid $20 in 1900 or thereabouts,” he said. “Then let’s say you had $400 a hundred years later. And in the meantime, you paid insurance and maybe some storage cost.”

Don’t miss:

In that same span, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose from roughly 60 to more than 11,000—delivering regular dividends along the way. “A farm has a utility. An apartment house has a utility. A business will produce a profit,” Buffett said.

He then added a comparison that became one of his most memorable. “I’d rather have the ability to sell people a sweet pound 20 years from now,” he said. “And if they are trading seashells, I will take an appropriate number of seashells instead of paper money for it.”

Buffett is not against hard assets. He just prefers those who produce.

He still lives in the Omaha home he bought in 1958 for $31,500. Today, that property is estimated to be worth about $1.4 million, according to Zillow. While he hasn’t turned a profit, the house is a quiet example of long-term appreciation.

He also praised residential real estate more broadly. In a 2012 CNBC interview, he said that if he could buy “a couple hundred thousand single-family homes” with 30-year mortgages, he would. He called them “a very attractive asset class” and described fixed-rate loans as “the best instrument in the world.”

His criticism of non-performing assets extended to cryptocurrency as well. “It produces nothing,” Buffett said of Bitcoin. “You just hope the next guy pays more.”

In 2020, some investors were surprised to see Berkshire Hathaway disclose a $565 million position in Barrick Gold, one of the world’s largest gold mining firms. But the share was short-lived. Analysts widely viewed it as a tactical move by Buffett’s portfolio managers, not a reversal of his views. Most of the shares were sold within a few quarters.

Waslet is a platform backed by Jeff Bezos that lets anyone invest in fractional shares of real estate that produces income for as little as $100. It’s in line with the type of productive assets that Buffett has spent years emphasizing. And while Buffett himself may not have a large real estate portfolio, he has been clear about the value that comes from assets that actually generate output.

Buffett does not base his investments on scarcity or sentiment. He looks for cash flow, utility, and long-term output—whether it’s farmland, apartment units, or even candy.

Gold, he said, “didn’t do very well.” And he sees “no reason why it would work well in the future.” That’s why he rates it “just about the last thing” he would want to have.

See Next:

The article Warren Buffett said gold is “just about the last thing” he would like to own — “he would much prefer” acres of land, an apartment or candy over the precious metal originally appeared on Benzinga.com

Leave a Comment