Jim Chanos Warns Of ‘Massive Financial Risk’ For CoreWeave, Oracle

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or income on some items through the links below.

A legendary short seller Jim Chanos is sounding the alarm on the boom infrastructure AI, warns that oversight of critical accounting regarding Nvidia Corp. (NASDAQ:NVDA) chips pose a “massive financial risk” to the sector’s aggressive spenders.

In a recent podcast interview, Chanos argued that data center operators, specifically Oracle Corp. (NYSE:ORCL) and a “neocloud” provider. CoreWeave Inc. (NASDAQ: CRWV ), are underestimating their future profitability by relying on unrealistic depreciation schedules for their artificial intelligence (AI) hardware.

The heart of Chanos’ bearish thesis is the estimated lifespan of the graphics processing units (GPUs) powering the AI ​​revolution.

Don’t miss: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a target yield of 7-9% with monthly dividends would you invest in it?

While hyperscalers and neoclouds typically depreciate these expensive assets over six years, Chanos claims that Nvidia’s relentless pace of innovation makes them obsolete much faster.

He noted that rental rates for Nvidia’s “Hopper” chips have already dropped roughly 28% year over year as newer models hit the market. If the useful economic life of a chip is closer to three or four years rather than six, companies must drastically increase their annual depreciation costs, which crushes reported earnings.

“If the chips last for three years, you have to depreciate a third of what you spend,” Chanos explained. “This is the bet you should make if you’re a CoreWeave investor.”

Benzinga reached out to Nvidia for comment on Chanos’ claims about GPU depreciation schedules and the useful life of its chips, but had not received a response at the time of publication.

Chanos singled out Oracle as the most vulnerable of the tech giants. He noted that, unlike Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:MSFT) or Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:META), Oracle is currently not earning its cost of capital on its massive investments in AI.

He described the company’s aggressive spending as a “bet the company” strategy that leaves little room for error.

“If the monetization of AI is pushed out … to 2030 or whenever, then Oracle will have fundamental financial problems,” Chanos warned.

See also: Did you miss Nvidia and Tesla? RAD Intel Could Be the Next AI Powerhouse — Invest Now with just $0.85 a Share

The investor views the current cycle as potentially riskier than the Dotcom bubble. In the late 1990s, companies buying telecommunications equipment were similarly profitable giants General Electric Co. (NYSE:GE) and AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T).

Leave a Comment