Irving Rosenberg spent his entire life building up his savings. At 90 years old, with impaired hearing, limited mobility, and early-stage dementia, the Southern California man had no reason to think that his $814,000 in savings at Wells Fargo was at risk.
It was.
Starting last April, someone started forging Rosenberg’s signature on checks and emptying his savings account. He had never written a single check from her. Withdrawals were made quickly – many over just a few weeks – and added up to $814,000. [1]
Rosenberg did not catch on. Because of his health, he was not in a position to. “I was angry and frustrated,” he told ABC7 Los Angeles. “I took my whole life’s savings… I got hurt.”
When Rosenberg realized what had happened, he called Wells Fargo looking for help. The bank opened an investigation – but offered little reassurance. “An investigation can go on forever,” he said. “That’s what they told me.”
Then came a letter: Wells Fargo was denying his fraud claim. Too much time passed before he contacted the bank. The bank’s deposit agreement gives customers 60 days to report unauthorized transactions. Rosenberg, who was dealing with dementia, skin cancer, and almost total hearing loss, had lost her.
His nephew David Satin, who had stepped in to help manage Rosenberg’s affairs, was stunned – especially after looking at the checks they cashed. “If you look at all the checks that have been written, none of them even have close to his signature, not even remotely close,” Satin told ABC7.
Satin pushed back against the counter directly. “I said, “Wait a second. He is 90. He has a little dementia. He can’t hear. He can barely walk. He has skin cancer. He is not noticing these kinds of things, and you are of no help to him.”
He also questioned why such massive withdrawals — many collected in a matter of weeks — were never flagged by Wells Fargo’s fraud systems in the first place. But he was getting nowhere. The bank just wasn’t responding.
With nowhere left to turn, Satin contacted ABC7’s consumer friendly team, 7 From Your Sideand asked for help.
Once the station started making inquiries, things changed quickly. “Since I contacted you, and you contacted them, they contacted me at least five times,” Satin said, adding that the bank became “much more responsive.”
As the report was being finalized, the good news arrived: Wells Fargo reversed its decision and agreed to return every dollar.
“After working with our client and their designated Power of Attorney, and reviewing additional information, we are pleased to share that we are returning Mr. Rosenberg’s money back to his account,” the bank said in a statement.
Rosenberg was acquitted. “I thank Channel 7 for doing this… thank you,” he told the station. “I feel much better. I can sleep.”
Rosenberg’s case ended well — but probably only because a television station was involved. There are several recent examples of older Wells Fargo customers experiencing the same thing.
In Dallas, 83-year-old Billie Young had a check intercepted and cashed by a stranger. Wells Fargo denied its claim in May 2025, citing “untimely reporting.” [2] After WFAA aired her story, families across the country were flooded with almost identical experiences. [3] In Philadelphia, an elderly woman sued after losing $450,000 to a tech support scam, alleged that Wells Fargo let five wire transfers go through before someone intervened. [4] And in January 2025, a FINRA panel ordered Wells Fargo to pay $3.4 million to the estate of a Georgia woman whose grandchildren exploited her while the bank ignored red flags. [5]
Wells Fargo has collected nearly $28 billion in penalties since 2000. This ranks it third among US megabanks, behind JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America. [6] But unlike its peers, Wells Fargo has a relatively small Wall Street operation — ordinary Americans are its core business, which means those penalties hit closer to home. In 2022, the CFPB ordered the bank to pay $3.7 billion for illegal activity affecting more than 16 million customers, [7] with Director Rohit Chopra calling it a “rinse-repeat cycle of breaking the law.”
Wells Fargo is not the only bank struggling with this. Financial institutions filed more than 680,000 suspicious activity reports related to check fraud in 2022 alone — nearly double the previous year — according to FinCEN. [8] Total check fraud losses in the Americas will reach approximately $21 billion in 2023. [9] And the elderly are absorbing the worst of it: FBI data shows Americans over 60 reported $4.9 billion in fraud losses in 2024, a 43% increase from the previous year. [10] The FTC estimates that the true toll, including unreported fraud, could reach $81.5 billion a year. [11]
“This crime is not just financial,” said Kathy Stokes of the AARP Fraud Watch Network. [12] “Some people have taken everything from them, and they will still say that the emotional impact is the hardest.”
Read More: The average net worth of Americans is a surprising $620,654. But it means almost nothing. Here’s the number that counts (and how it skyrockets)
The 60-day reporting deadline that nearly sank Rosenberg’s claim is standard at most major banks — and creates a particular trap for older customers. The onus is entirely on the account holder to review the monthly statements and flag unauthorized transactions in that window. Miss it, and the bank considers the matter closed. No exceptions, no questions asked.
Ask yourself: how confident are you that your 80-year-old parent is reviewing their bank statements every month?
Congress is trying to address this. The bipartisan Financial Exploitation Prevention Act, [13] reintroduced in 2025, it allows financial institutions to delay suspicious transactions when they believe an elderly or disabled customer is being exploited. The House version passed the committee 50–0. [14]
Report immediately — and do so in writing. Flag suspicious transactions the moment you spot them and follow up with a letter or email. Keep copies of everything. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, victims of check fraud technically have up to a year to file a claim, even if the bank’s internal deadline is shorter.
File with regulators and law enforcement. Report it to your local police, the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (ic3.gov), and the CFPB (consumerfinance.gov). A CFPB complaint, in particular, could pressure banks to take a second look at denied claims.
Set account alerts before anything goes wrong. Most banks offer free notifications for large withdrawals and new check activity. If you’re helping manage an elderly relative’s finances, enable those alerts on your own phone.
Appoint a trusted contact and consider power of attorney. A trusted contact creates a safety net without giving that person control of the account. A durable financial power of attorney goes further — it lets a family member step in and act before the damage is done. That’s ultimately what helped Rosenberg’s family, but by the time Satin got involved, the money was already gone.
If your request is denied, escalate it. Rosenberg’s and Young’s cases both show that initial denials are not always the final word. Ask for a supervisor review, get your state attorney general’s office involved, and don’t underestimate the media’s local consumer advocacy teams — they were the turning point in both stories.
Ditch paper checks. With check fraud at epidemic levels, switching to electronic payments is one of the simplest ways to protect yourself and the people you care about.
The fact that it took a televised investigation for a major bank to return $814,000 in forged checks obviously speaks volumes on its own.
Join 200,000 readers and be the first to get the best Moneywise exclusive stories and interviews — clear insight curated and delivered every week. Subscribe now.
—
Article sources
We rely only on verified sources and credible reporting from third parties. For details, see our editorial ethics and guidelines*.*
ABC7 Los Angeles (1); WFAA Dallas (2); WFAA Dallas (3); Upper Class Actions (4); Financial Planning (5); Violation Tracker (6); CFPB (7); FinCEN (8); Nasdaq Report on Global Financial Crime (9); FBI/IC3 (10); CNBC (11); AARP (12); Congress.gov (13); CNBC (14)
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
